tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1396682199178122530.post2828925792908977731..comments2023-12-28T22:22:42.307-08:00Comments on Nobody In Particular: Evolution, SpunAaronhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03128359303310478673noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1396682199178122530.post-88035651784793516042007-07-02T13:02:00.000-07:002007-07-02T13:02:00.000-07:00why should terminology change because a few people...why should terminology change because a few people willfully confuse "theory" with "hypothesis"?twifferhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07019975906761715327noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1396682199178122530.post-14891146766737349382007-05-08T05:31:00.000-07:002007-05-08T05:31:00.000-07:00Science needs a new word. "Theory" should not be ...Science needs a new word. "Theory" should not be used for "it's a fact but we'd need all data on planet earth to meet science's 'fact' standard". The science community needs to pull a Rove and come up with some double speak that better sells "theories" that are, for all practical purposes, fact.<BR/><BR/>Example: strapping C4 to my head and detonating will kill me? Theory or Fact? Fact to most reasonable people. <BR/><BR/>Example2: green houses gases warm up the planet. Theory or Fact? Here's where we need some double speak :)<BR/><BR/>Example3: The bible belt needs a F50000 tornado brought on by god. FACTbenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05379168689334261354noreply@blogger.com